USPTO serial 76028621
POWER PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGINIA R RICHARD
VIRGINIA R RICHARD WINSTON & STRAWN200 PARK AVE, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering specifications, and technical consultation and assistance relating to laminated wood building products used as components of building structures; software design relating to laminated wood building products used as components of building structures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |