Drawing for BIGPIPE.COM

USPTO serial 76029167

BIGPIPE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIGPIPE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES TO THE CABLE TELEVISION AND BROADBAND INDUSTRIES; PROVIDING AN ONLINE PORTAL TO WEB LINKS OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF THE CABLE TELEVISION AND BROADBAND; DATABASE INFORMATION STORAGE SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL SERVICES; MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES; PROVIDING ONLINE SERVICES TO THE CABLE TELEVISION AND BROADBAND INDUSTRIES, NAMELY PROVIDING ONLINE NEWS, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, SEARCHABLE DATABASES, AND DATA THAT MAY BE RETRIEVED AND DOWNLOADED; PROVIDING OTHERS WITH THE ONLINE ABILITY TO SELL CABLE TELEVISION SUBSCRIPTIONS AND ONE-TIME CABLE TELEVISION ACCESS PROGRAMS AND TO ADVERTISE THEIR PRODUCTS OVER THE INTERNET; ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING CABLE HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; PROVIDING ONLINE BUSINESS TO BUSINESS RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CABLE TELEVISION HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED MATERIAL AND CONTESTS; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING ON-LINE FOR OTHERSACTIVE
038REMOTE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SERVICES; PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF CABLE TELEVISION AND BROADBAND; INSTANT MESSAGING SERVICESACTIVE
042PROVIDING OTHERS IN THE CABLE TELEVISION AND BROADBAND INDUSTRIES WITH NEWS, INFORMATION, DATABASES, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE OPPORTUNITIES AND ACCESS TO COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, ALL THROUGH A WEB SITE ON THE INTERNET; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance