USPTO serial 76029227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Swindon Wiltshire SN3 1RE, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN STSTE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management and business information services relating to the efficient use of machinery; business management and business information services relating to the efficient use and supply of chemical products and lubricants used in connection with machinery; business management and business consultancy services; business project management; procurement, namely purchasing industrial machinery and equipment, lubricating oils, lubricating greases and lubricants for industrial machinery and equipment, for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, repair and maintenance services relating to equipment and machinery used in industrial processes; project management services, namely, maintenance and servicing of industrial equipment and machinery; waste disposal services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely conducting classes, workshops and seminars in the field of the operation and maintenance of machinery, the management of industrial processes and the use of lubricants in industry; training in the use and operation of computers and in the use and operation of industrial machinery and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consultation in the field of the efficient use of chemicals and lubricants used in connection with maintenance and operation of machinery; technical consultation in the field of waste disposal; technical consultation in the field of the performance and efficiency of lubricants and machinery; technical consultation, research, development and analysis of chemicals and oils; research, development and analysis of chemicals and oils used in and in connection with machinery; research, analysis and monitoring services relating to the performance and efficiency of lubricants and machinery used in industrial processes; technical consultation in the field of the performance and efficiency of lubricants and machinery used in industrial processes; engineering surveys relating to lubricants, machinery and equipment used industrial processes; project management services, namely, monitoring and improving the performance and efficiency of industrial processes, industrial machinery and industrial lubricants; design services for others in the field of factories and workshops and in the field of computer software; technical support services in the fields of engineering and computers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |