USPTO serial 76029239
KENNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2003
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KENNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, PABROADWAY PL E STE 4013433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging for subscriptions for the publications of others, namely, periodicals; Arranging for ticket reservations for entertainment events; Direct market advertising for others; Business management consulting services in the fields of computers, sales, marketing; conducting business and market research surveys; Conducting marketing studies and customer lead generation research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer Application Development Services; Computer Software Development for Others in a Wide Variety of Fields; Computer Software Installation Services; Technical Support Services, namely, Trouble-Shooting of Computer Hardware and Software via in Person, Telephone or a Global Computer Network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |