USPTO serial 76029302
POLISHED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLISHED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer R Adler
JENNIFER R ADLER BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty care and spa products, namely, hand lotion, foot lotion, nail polish, nail care preparations, skin cleanser, skin toner, face moisturizer, eye moisturizer, lip moisturizer, facial exfoliator/scrub, eye make-up, lip make-up, face make-up, bath foam, shower gel, bath soap, body exfoliator/scrub, bath salts, body lotion; suntan products, namely, suntan gels, suntan lotions, suntan oils and suntan sprays; massage products, namely, massage oil, massage cream and massage oil; hair shampoo and conditioners; hair styling products, namely, hair gel, hair lotion, hair spray, hair cream, hair mousse and hair balm; shaving products, namely, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, shaving oil and shaving balm; fragrance for the body, namely, cologne, perfume and scented oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manicure/pedicure implements, namely, file, clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, cuticle nippers, nail buffers and cuticle scissors; make-up implements, namely, make-up applicators, make-up brushes, make-up sponges and eyelash curlers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |