USPTO serial 76029319
ONEID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS SCHNECK
THOMAS SCHNECK LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS SCHNECKP O BOX 2-ESAN JOSE, CA 95109-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SECURELY STORING PERSONAL USER INFORMATION ACCESSIBLE FOR FACILITATING THE AUTOMATIC COMPLETION OF FORMS AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS ON WORLD WIDE WEB SITES, FOR ENABLING WORLD WIDE WEB SITES TO SEND AND RECEIVE INFORMATION AND FOR DETECTING ATTEMPTS AT FRAUDULENT CREDIT CARD USE; COMPUTER SECURITY PRODUCTS, NAMELY BLANK SMART CARDS; ENCODED SMART CARDS FOR USE IN COMPUTER SECURITY; ENCODED COMPUTER TOKENS FOR USE IN COMPUTER SECURITY; COMMUNICATIONS SERVERS; CLIENTS, NAMELY CLIENT COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE WITH COMPUTER SECURITY PRODUCTS AND FOR USE IN COMPUTER SECURITY; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN IDENTIFYING, AUTHENTICATING AND ENCRYPTING AND DECRYPTING DATA; PRE-RECORDED ELECTRONIC DATA CARRIERS, NAMELY CDS, FLOPPY DISKS AND DISKETTES FEATURING INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WEB SITES OF A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK OFFERING AND RECEIVING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING GENERAL INFORMATION OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY; PROVIDING INFORMATION CONCERNING COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, PARTICULARLY REGARDING WEB SITES, OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMPUTER CONSULTING, NAMELY PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WEB SITES ON A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK WHICH OFFER AND RECEIVE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |