USPTO serial 76029486
HYPERGAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPERGAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER M. EICHLER
PETER M EICHLER CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAY1901 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer games, computerized game cartridges, computer game discs, computer game equipment continuing memory devices, computer game programs, computer game software, computer game hardware, computer operating programs, virtual reality game software; video game cartridges, video game discs, video game software, video game hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | licensing of computer games to third parties, licensing of video games to third parties, licensing of direct retailing concepts based upon computer games to third parties; licensing of direct retailing concepts based upon video games to third parties; manufacture, sale and direct retailing of computer games and video games for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |