USPTO serial 76029622
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Roxanne Elings
G ROXANNE ELINGS GRAHAM & JAMES LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hardware and software used to integrate and provide personalized access to interactive media and multimedia on demand for viewing and entertainment purposes, namely, video-on-demand, audio-on-demand live television and radio, interactive television, web browsing and e-mail, secure electronic commerce, telephone and multi-player gaming; computer hardware and peripherals, namely, interface devices for accessing global computer networks, video circuit board cards, wired and infrared keyboard input circuit board cards and modem circuit board cards, and user manuals sold with all products listed above | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; audio-on-demand and video-on-demand services; broadcasting radio and television programs via cable links and digital subscriber lines; interactive television; electronic mail services; telephone communication | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing multi-player gaming via cable links and digital subscriber lines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data encryption services for secure electronic commerce | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |