USPTO serial 76029659
TECHNOLOGY ARCHITECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY ARCHITECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Patula
TIMOTHY T PATULA PATULA & ASSOCIATES116 S MICHIGAN AVE 14TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ORGANIZING AND MAINTAINING BUSINESS TASK IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE APPLICATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PERSONNEL STAFFING AND OUTSOURCING FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING; EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY RECRUITMENT, PLACEMENT OF PERSONNEL, EXECUTIVE RECRUITMENT AND EXECUTIVE SEARCH SERVICES; BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, PLACEMENT, RECRUITMENT AND RELOCATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE, ENGINEERING SERVICES, TECHNICAL WRITING, WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING, AND CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED THERETO | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interim Services Pacific LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TECHNOLOGY ARCHITECTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |