USPTO serial 76029774
CABAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CABAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony F. Lo Cicero
ANTHONY F LO CICERO AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |