Drawing for IRREPLACEABLE COLLECTION

USPTO serial 76030058

IRREPLACEABLE COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRREPLACEABLE COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harriet E. Perkins

HARRIET E PERKINS SEIDEL GONDA LAVORGNA & MONACO PC2 PENN CTR PLZ STE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-1725UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Ring having an empty gem socketACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jun 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 8, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 22, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 6, 2003REINREINSTATED
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance