USPTO serial 76030172
PRO.DUCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO.DUCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Lynn Perry
MARGARET C MCHUGH TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medical device for accessing breast milk ducts for fluid and agent infusion into assessed breast duct, fluid and material collection from accessed the breast duct, and fluid and material aspiration from within the accessed breast duct; medical supply kits containing chemical reagents for aiding in the intraductal procedures of infusion, collection and aspiration for use in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer and other conditions of the breast | ACTIVE | Aug 10, 2000 |
| 010 | Medical devices for aiding in the intraductal procedures of infusion, collection and aspiration, namely, catheters, stents, aspirator cups, dilators, and other tools for performing breast duct access, namely, breast duct access catheters, micro catheters, stents, dilators, endoscopes, ductoscopes, nipple aspirators, and generally breast duct access devices for access, fluid infusion and fluid retrieval, to perform diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer and other breast conditions, and medical supply kits comprising such devices | ACTIVE | Aug 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |