USPTO serial 76030520
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.
Las Vegas, NV
Other trademarks owned by CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.
Las Vegas, NV
Other trademarks owned by CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.
Las Vegas, NV
Other trademarks owned by CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Levy
JOHN M MUELLER TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP425 WALNUT ST STE 1800CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hunting knives, folding knives, chef knives, kitchen knives, butcher knives, paring knives, fishing knives, spot knives, non-electric can openers, pizza cutters, non-electric fruit peelers, non-electric vegetable peelers, plastic jar grippers, scissors, nut crackers not of precious metal, egg slicers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |