Drawing for DIRECT IMPACT

USPTO serial 76030815

DIRECT IMPACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECT IMPACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Products related to counter-narcotics, counter terrorism, Internet commerce, law enforcement, space policy and commerce, namelyACTIVE
035strategic business consulting services and business research regarding Internet commerce and commerce in outer spaceACTIVE
042Strategic consulting services regarding counter-terrorism and law enforcement; research services regarding counter-terrorism, law enforcement and outer space policyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 7, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance