Drawing for FLIGHT CREW

USPTO serial 76030904

FLIGHT CREW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIGHT CREW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT J. SACCO

ROBERT J SACCO AKERMAN, SENTERFITT & EIDSON, PA222 LAKEVIEW AVE STE 400P O BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018luggageACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 6, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 6, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 25, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 15, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Apr 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 17, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance