USPTO serial 76030916
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee
WILLIAM M LEE BARNES & THORNBURGPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION TOOLS RELATING TO ENTERPRISE COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS AND MANUALS FEATURING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, RECORDED ON MAGNETIC DISKS, COMPUTER DISKS, AND DOWNLOADABLE FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATIONS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION, UPDATING, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING ELIMINATION OF COMPUTER VIRUSES; INFORMATION RELATING TO CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION RELATING TO DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATIONS; INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; INFORMATION RELATING TO INSTALLATION, UPDATING, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; AND INFORMATION RELATING TO MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING ELIMINATION OF COMPUTER VIRUSES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |