USPTO serial 76030917
EI2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EI2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee, Jr
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS, SWEENEYP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION TOOLS RELATING TO ENTERPRISE COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS AND MANUALS FEATURING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, RECORDED ON MAGNETIC DISKS, COMPUTER DISKS, AND DOWNLOADABLE FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATIONS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION, UPDATING,MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING ELIMINATION OF COMPUTER VIRUSES; INFORMATION RELATING TO CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION RELATING TO DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE. SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATIONS; INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; INFORMATION RELATING TO INSTALLATION, UPDATING, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; AND INFORMATION RELATING TO MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING ELIMINATION OF COMPUTER VIRUSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |