Drawing for VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA

USPTO serial 76030962

VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROHIT U SHENDRIKAR

ROHIT U SHENDRIKAR MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION SERVICES; NAMELY, MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FILMS; MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FILM PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION; THEATRICAL, DRAMATIC AND MUSICAL PRODUCTION AND PERFORMANCE; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF A TELEVISION SERIES; PROVIDING CONTINUING PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF COMEDY, SCIENCE FICTION, DRAMA, ACTION, ADVENTURE, ANIMATION AND DOCUMENTS ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING A VARIETY OF TOPICS RELATED TO ENTERTAINMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AMUSEMENT, THEME PARK AND WATER PARK RIDES AND SERVICES; PROVIDING EXHIBITIONS FEATURING SCIENCE FICTION AND ENTERTAINMENTACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 29, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 10, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 10, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 1, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 18, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 18, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance