USPTO serial 76030981
XS CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XS CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online retail store services featuring clothing and shoes, sports equipment, namely, surf boards, snow boards and snowboarding boots, skis and ski boots and poles, skate boards, scooters, in-line skates, mountain bikes, climbing and hiking gear, sky diving and sky surfing backpacks, parachutes, and goggles, and accessories and parts for said sporting equipment, jewelry, motorized vehicles and parts and supplies therefor, furniture, home furnishings, electronic and photography equipment, computer hardware and software, books, magazines, games, video games, movies, videos, DVDs, food products and beverages, dietary supplements and health foods, and flowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL APPAREL GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL APPAREL GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XS CITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PGRN | PETITION GRANTED - ISSUE NEW NOA | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |