USPTO serial 76031141
AEGIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEGIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. WAYNE LIAUH
W WAYNE LIAUH LAW OFFICE OF LIAUH AND ASSOCIATES4224 WAIALAE AVE STE 5-388HONOLULU, HI 96816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Hotels; Motels; Hotel reservations; Restaurants; cafeterias; Cafes; Architecture; Design of interior decor; Landscape gardening; Land surveying; Beauty salons; Hairdressing salons; Sauna; Slimming; massage; Manicuring; Public baths for hygiene purposes; professional consultancy for beauty related treatment; providing know-how in teaching aerobic exercises and fitness advisory services; Providing consultation and about foods and nutrition; Health care; Computer program design; Computer software design; Computer systems analyses; computer data process; Maintenance of computer software; Rental building management; Horoscope casting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |