USPTO serial 76031294
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Washburn, Esquire
ROBERT B WASHBURN ESQ WOODCOCK WASHBURN KURTRMACKIEWICZ & NORRIS LLPONE LIBERTY PL 46TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DNA and RNA in association with fluorinated organic compounds for use in scientific and medical research, namely, for use in gene expression and delivery | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | DNA or RNA in association with fluorinated organic compounds for use in medical diagnostic or clinical medical procedures, namely for use in gene therapy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |