USPTO serial 76031586
REDIFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2006
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with REDIFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*
Plus Government fees of $3,400
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mahim West, Mumbai, IN
Mahim West, Mumbai, IN
Mumbai, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing a website at which consumers can place orders for the goods and services of others; electronic retail services in the fields of travel, entertainment, music, books, jewelry and education; promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements via electronic communications networks; online directory services, namely providing website links to news, current events, and reference materials via a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to electronic communications networks; providing electronic bulletin boards and chat rooms for the transmission of messages among computer users in the fields of news, weather, finance, networking, sports, dating and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Computer services, namely creating and maintaining a web site containing information in the fields of sports, entertainment and education | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely creating and maintaining a web site containing a wide range of general interest and commercial information in the fields of news, weather, travel, dining, astrology, networking, politics, romance, and technology; hosting the web sites of others via electronic communications networks; computer services, namely, providing search engines for locating information available by means of electronic communications networks; website design and development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rediff.com India Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rediff.com India Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rediff.com India Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REDIFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |