USPTO serial 76031695
QUEST TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUEST TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesus Sanchelima
SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES PA235 S W LE JEUNE RDMIAMI, FL 33134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS FOR USE ON COAXIAL CABLES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSMISSION OF RADIO FREQUENCY-- TELECOMMUNICATIONS, DATA COMMUNICATIONS, 2 WAY RADIO, BROADCAST, MICROWAVE, VIDEO, AUDIO, AND FOR LAN (LOCAL AREA NETWORK) CONNECTIVITY ACCESSORY PRODUCTS NAMELY, PATCH PANELS, CONNECTING JACKS, MOUNTING BOXES AND FACEPLATES, WIRE, CABLE, PATCH CORDS, HUBS, SWITCHES, ROUTERS USED PRIMARILY IN COMPUTER NETWORK FIELDS AND FOR HAND TOOLS THAT ARE UTILIZED IN THE ATTACHING OF CONNECTORS TO CABLES, AND FOR MULTI-CONDUCTOR CONNECTORS, AND FOR CATV, (CABLE ANTENNA TELEVISION) AND (MATV) MASTER ANTENNA TELEVISION) PRODUCTS NAMELY SPLITTERS, TAPS, AND CABLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |