USPTO serial 76031790
BOOKINGS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOOKINGS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN HERBERT
ESTER MARTIN MAILLARO FAEGRE & BENSON LLPSTE 3200 1700 LINCOLN STDENVER, CO 80203-4532UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Providing information concerning travel by means of a computer network | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 1995 |
| 041 | Providing information concerning entertainment and sporting events by means of a computer network | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 1995 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing an on-line magazine concerning entertainment, sporting events and travel | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |