USPTO serial 76032021
INSTIPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTIPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Eisen
STEVEN J EISEN BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN & CALDWELLCOMMERCE CTR211 COMMERCE ST STE 1000NASHVILLE, TN 37201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware used to create and maintain from a remote site a database of detailed information concerning transaction specific money transmittal documents, namely, personal and vendor checks, and the ability to track such issued documents from generation to presentment | ACTIVE | Jan 20, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |