USPTO serial 76032073
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MALAGA WE 6090, AU
Malaga, Western Australia, AU
Malaga, Western Australia, AU
Malaga, Western Australia, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Shewchuk.
Jeffrey D. Shewchuk. SHEWCHUK IP SERVICES, LLC3356 Sherman Court, Suite 102EAGAN, MN 55121UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Pest barriers, namely, termite barriers in the form of a mesh, [ grid, porous panel, porous plate, or strip ] all made from metal; metal termite barriers for use with penetrations in concrete slabs and other sections of building structures; replacement parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Pest control services; Installation of pest barriers, namely, installation of termite barriers and solutions involving coatings applied to building structures; [ installation of baiting systems which attract termites to specific locations to assist in their detection; ] installation of termite barriers in the form of meshes, [ grids, porous panels, porous plates or strips ] for domestic, commercial and industrial use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |