USPTO serial 76032587
MCHEALTH CLINIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCHEALTH CLINIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | healthcare services, namely, preventative, alternative, and conventional healthcare | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Basharat A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Basharat A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Irfan A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Irfan A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Furhan A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Furhan A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Usman A.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamil, Usman A.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MCHEALTH CLINIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |