USPTO serial 76032832
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M Moss
KEVIN M MOSS KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, COURIER, DELIVERY AND TRANSPORT SERVICES; COMPUTER SEARCH ENGINE SOFTWARE; COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFORE; COMPACT DISCS, VIDEO DISCS AND DVD DISCS, ALL FEATURING AUDIO AND AUDIOVISUAL PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF ENTERTAINMENT, BUSINESS, AND COURIER, DELIVERY AND TRANSPORT SERVICES; BLANK ELECTRONIC AND MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; AND COMPUTER DATABASES FEATURING BUSINESS INFORMATION AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COURIER, DELIVERY AND TRANSPORT SERVICES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA OR PROVIDED VIA DOWNLOAD FROM THE INTERNET OR OTHER COMPUTER OR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |