USPTO serial 76032835
PARCELWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARCELWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M Moss
KEVIN M MOSS KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER, ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD ADVERTISING, AND DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY MARKET RESEARCH, MARKET ANALYSIS AND CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES; COST PRICE ANALYSIS; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING COMPUTERIZED BUSINESS INFORMATION; PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING COMPUTERIZED BUSINESS INFORMATION; ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING COURIER, DELIVERY AND TRANSPORT SERVICES AND RELAXED PRODUCTS; COMPUTERIZED TRACKING AND TRACING OF PACKAGES IN TRANSIT; AND INTERNET PORTAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE DIRECTORY INFORMATION SERVICES FEATURING HYPERLINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |