Drawing for HULARO

USPTO serial 76032974

HULARO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HULARO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, frames, namely, bed frames, embroidery frames, furniture frames and picture frames; furniture made of synthetic fiberACTIVE
022Synthetic fibers not for fabric useACTIVE
042Counseling services concerning the planning of the interior equipment of residential space, offices and storage spaceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 17, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 7, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 7, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 8, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 8, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance