USPTO serial 76033075
CLUB MED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2005
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLUB MED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75019 Paris, FR
75019 Paris, FR
75019 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine A Rittenhouse
Jeannine A Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cook RoadSuite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, outerclothing, namely, coats, foul weather gear, mittens, earmuffs, aprons, and cloth bibs; sportswear, namely, kerchiefs, and suspenders; golf shoes; activewear, namely, lounge wear, body suits, and slacks; workout clothing, namely, leotards, tights, wet suits, track suits; intimate apparel, namely, bras, panties, underwear, underpants, undergarments, underclothes, pajamas, night shirts, lingerie; robes, namely, bathrobes; scarves; neckwear, namely, ties; belts; shower and bathing caps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 6, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 4, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |