USPTO serial 76033266
Serial No. 76033266
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76033266?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | All-purpose lubricants derived from petroleum, fuel oil derived from petroleum, fuel oil derived from petroleum, crude oil; refined petroleum products, namely, gasoline; petroleum products, namely, industrial oils and greases, industrial lubricants, automotive greases, motor oil, carnauba wax, hydrocarbon fuels in liquid and gaseous form, fuel for motor vehicles, namely, gasoline and diesel fuel, fuels for aircraft, fuel oil, namely, ethane, butane, and propane; petroleum illuminants, namely, candles, and synthetic all purpose lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |