USPTO serial 76033489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace W. Lawson
GRACE W LAWSON LIPSTEIN JAFFE & LAWSON LLP1225 EYE STREETNW STE 700Washington, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized database management | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | providing educational information in the field of science via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | providing non-downloadable computer software for use in accessing and searching databases in the field of science via a global computer network, and information in the fields of science and scientific research | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |