USPTO serial 76033600
MIPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN S COSTANZA
KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYLAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, portable voice- and manually-activated personal computing devices for managing information and exchanging information with a desktop computer and with a computer network or global communication network; electronic devices, namely, wireless, hand-held personal computers; electronic devices, namely, wireless telecommunication devices; automatic telephone dialers; computer software in the nature of personal information organizers and managers, accomplished partly via communication with a computer network or global communication network; computer software for transmitting and receiving electronic mail, text, graphics, audio, video and other data from a remote computer network and for accessing global communications networks; computer telephony software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |