USPTO serial 76033615
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Making Everlasting Memories, Ltd.
Cincinnati, OH
Making Everlasting Memories, Ltd.
Cincinnati, OH
MAKING EVERLASTING MEMORIES, L.L.C.
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by MAKING EVERLASTING MEMORIES, L.L.C.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica L. Dias
Monica L. Dias FROST BROWN TODD LLC3300 GREAT AMERICAN TOWER, 301 E. 4TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing a website containing a multi-media presentation, data and other reference information for researching the histories and current events of people, objects and entities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |