USPTO serial 76034081
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Paul, MN
St. Paul, MN
St. Paul, MN
O'BRIEN, JUSTIN AND KING, THERESA
ST. PAUL, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Bondi
Michael A. Bondi Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC100 South Fifth Street, Suite 2250Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, HANDOUTS AND PERIODICALS, NAMELY , MAGAZINES, PAMPHLETS, PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS, ALL OF THE ABOVE IN THE FIELD OF RELIGIOUS, SPIRITUAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |