USPTO serial 76034658
IMAGEMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGEMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRINCETON GAMMA-TECH INSTRUMENTS, INC.
ROCKY HILL, NJ
Other trademarks owned by PRINCETON GAMMA-TECH INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Rocky Hill, NJ
Rocky Hill, NJ
MADISON, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN G LINIHAN
MARTIN G LINIHAN HODGSON RUSS ANDREWS WOODSHODGSON RUSS ANDREWS WOODS, ET AL1 M & T PLZ STE 2000BUFFALO, NY 14203-2391Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Image collectors comprising computer hardware for active-scan digital imaging spectroscopic analyzers, for non-electrophoresis use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRINCETON GAMMA-TECH INSTRUMENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BRUKER AXS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IMAGEMASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |