USPTO serial 76035012
TUTTLE & QUINN PUBLISHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUTTLE & QUINN PUBLISHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HELEN D REAVIS
HELEN D REAVIS SCAROLA & REAVIS888 7TH AVE 45TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Line of non-fiction books in the fields of educational process, social and behavioral science, computer technology, computers, current events and child development | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1999 |
| 041 | Consulting services related to the editing, design and marketing of publications | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |