USPTO serial 76035132
WHERE BRIGHT IDEAS ARE SOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHERE BRIGHT IDEAS ARE SOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grosse Pointe, MI
Grosse Pointe, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Schwartz
PAUL M SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ & SCHWARTZ, PLC29623 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 200SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BROKERAGE IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, NAMELY PROMOTION OF THE SALE OF PATENTS ON BEHALF OF THIRD PARTIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |