USPTO serial 76035159
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Central Hong Kong, HK
Central Hong Kong, HK
Wan Chai, HK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon E. R. Troy, Esq.
Gordon E. R. Troy, Esq. GORDON E. R. TROY, PCP.O. Box 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational and training services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops via on-line instruction in the field of human resources, personnel for organizations and enterprise knowledge management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | computer consultation concerning computer software and computer hardware all related to the fields of education, training and learning management systems; computer software design for education, training systems and learning management systems for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |