USPTO serial 76035666
BETH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Middleburg Heights, OH
Middleburg Heights, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger D. Emerson
DAVID R POSTERARO KOHRMAN JACKSON & KRANTZ PLL20TH FLONE CLEVELAND CTR 1375 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1793Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |