USPTO serial 76035792
CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2003
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
Exton, PA
Other trademarks owned by Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
Exton, PA
Other trademarks owned by Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
Exton, PA
Other trademarks owned by Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine Flaster/Greenberg, P.C.1600 JFK Boulevard, 2nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-2808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting conferences on technology in the field of cable telecommunications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |