USPTO serial 76035975
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN ESQ
NORMAN ZAFMAN ESQ BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR, ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1026UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic and skin care preparations, namely, soaps, cleansers, tonic lotions, essential oils for personal use, body lotions, bath salts, bubble baths and facial cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of sensitive and/or dry skin; herbal supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Prerecorded data carriers and recording discs namely, videocassettes, DVDs and CD-ROM discs, featuring an audio-visual presentation of information on beauty and health, namely, cosmetics, hair, skin care and exercise | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books, newsletters, magazines and printed guides all featuring information on beauty and health, namely, cosmetics, hair, skin care and exercise; photographs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring cosmetics, skin and hair care products and exercise products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information on health and beauty, namely, cosmetics, skin and hair care products and exercise, via the Internet; Consultation services in the application of cosmetics; health and beauty services, namely, facials and waxing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |