Drawing for BUILD A MORE RELIABLE WORLD

USPTO serial 76036058

BUILD A MORE RELIABLE WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3121064Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2006
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BUILD A MORE RELIABLE WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Hart

Beverly Shin, Robert P. Hart, Lynn Harman8500 Balboa Blvd.Northridge, CA 91329UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF A COMPUTER AND THE EXECUTION OF PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO EXECUTE GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES WHICH FACILITATES THE CREATION AND EXECUTION OF VISUAL PROGRAMS; SOFTWARE, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; NETWORKING SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR CONNECTING COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING ON LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, AND FOR USE IN THE TRANSFER OF INFORMATION BETWEEN COMPUTERS; WEB BROWSERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE TRANSFER OF INFORMATION AND THE CONDUCT OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS ACROSS LOCAL, NATIONAL AND WORLDWIDE INFORMATION NETWORKS; MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE THE AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, FOR THE INTEGRATION OF TEXT, AUDIO, GRAPHICS, STILL IMAGES AND MOVING PICTURES; AND INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKS AND GUIDES SOLD AS A UNIT WITH THE SOFTWARE REFERRED TO ABOVE; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOK GUIDES AND MANUALS FEATURING SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND EDUCATIONSECTION 8 - CANCELLED
016PRINTED BOOKS, GUIDES AND MANUALS RELATED TO SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARESECTION 8 - CANCELLED
041COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES OF INSTRUCTION FOR EMPLOYEES AND USERS OF OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMINGSECTION 8 - CANCELLED
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATIONS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Feb 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 18, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 3, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 9, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 11, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 11, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 27, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 13, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 4, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 27, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Jun 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 19, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
May 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 15, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
May 19, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 19, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
May 4, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 30, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance