USPTO serial 76036080
MERITEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERITEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claire M. Kimball
CLAIRE M KIMBALL ALSTON & BIRD LLP1201 W PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309-3424UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; business consultation; business information for engineering infrastructure services and information management, pollution control, and hazardous substances management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction and repair; construction engineering; building demolition; installation of electricity distribution networks, telecommunication networks, and distribution networks; construction and repair of buildings, namely, electricity generating facilities, roads, highways, and transportation facilities, water and waste facilities, industrial plants, environmental control facilities, and facilities to handle and distribute natural gas, LPG, geothermal, combined cycle power, and renewable energy sources, namely, wind, solar, biogas, and geothermal | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Architectural consultation; construction drafting; industrial design; engineering; engineering drawing; geological prospecting, research and surveying; land surveying; technical consulting, feasibility studies, and research in the fields of electricity generating facilities, electricity distribution networks, roads, highways and transportation facilities and distributions, industrial plants, environmental control facilities and distributions, telecommunications generation networks and distribution networks, and water, natural gas, LPG, geothermal, combined cycle power and renewable energy sources, namely, wind, solar, biogas and geothermal facilities and distribution; testing of equipment, materials, and workmanship; design, consultation in respect of, and undertaking of structural, civil, mining, process, mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, maintenance, process and pipeline engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERITEC GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Worley Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MERITEC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |