USPTO serial 76036271
CARDINAL GROWTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARDINAL GROWTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane G. Elder
JULIE NICHOLS MATTHEWS WILDMAN HARROLD ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 WEST WACKER DRIVESUITE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financing services, namely, private equity financing services | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |