USPTO serial 76036731
COLLEGE ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLLEGE ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Denniston
Michael S. Denniston Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP1819 Fifth Avenue NorthOne Federal PlaceBirmingham, AL 35203-2119Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STUDENT ADVANTAGE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STUDENT ADVANTAGE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STUDENT ADVANTAGE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COLLEGE ADVANTAGE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |