USPTO serial 76036793
ALLEGHENY ADVANTAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLEGHENY ADVANTAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold B. Silverman
ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Information technology technical support services and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of HVAC equipment and appliances, lighting systems, and security systems; maintenance and repair of apparatus energized by electricity or natural gas, utility right of way maintenance, namely, tree trimming and vegetation control | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electrical and natural as utility services; energy transmission and distribution services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services; design of lighting and security systems; information technology, consulting services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via e-mail, telephone and on-site visits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |