USPTO serial 76036798
ALLEGHENY HOME ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2673357Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 2003
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALLEGHENY HOME ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Fairmont, WV
Fairmont, WV
Greensburg, PA
Greensburg, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold B. Silverman
ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING EXTENDED WARRANTIES ON APPLIANCES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF HVAC EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES; REPAIR OF CATV AND TELEPHONE LINES; INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS; UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY MAINTENANCE, NAMELY, TREE TRIMMING AND VEGETATION CONTROL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 042 | DESIGN OF OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES; ENERGY AUDIT SERVICES; ENERGY USAGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by Monongahela Power Company
- Other trademarks owned by Monongahela Power Company
- Other trademarks owned by West Penn Power Company
- Other trademarks owned by West Penn Power Company
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALLEGHENY HOME ADVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |