USPTO serial 76036907
STEP-TAPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEP-TAPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berkeley Heights, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | CONCRETE PILES, FORMED BY DRIVING CORRUGATED SHELLS WITH AN INTERNAL MANDREL AND THEN WITHDRAWING THE MANDREL BEFORE FILLING THE SHELL WITH CONCRETE, USED TO SUPPORT STRUCTURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |